In today’s Washington Post Michael Gerson whines about the meanness of the internet.
Somehow he’d like to banish all “cyber-bigots” from speaking their peace because well – they’re bigots and it’s a step towards Naziism.
But the challenge of this technology [the net] is not merely an isolated subculture of hatred. It is a disorienting atmosphere in which information is difficult to verify or critically evaluate, the rules of discourse are unclear, and emotion — often expressed in CAPITAL LETTERS — is primary. User-driven content on the Internet often consists of bullying, conspiracy theories and racial prejudice. The absolute freedom of the medium paradoxically encourages authoritarian impulses to intimidate and silence others. The least responsible contributors see their darkest tendencies legitimated and reinforced, while serious voices are driven away by the general ugliness.
Michael Gerson is of the main stream media. So he’s having a hard time watching his paper news fall but let’s think this through.
Nazi Germany used technology to their advantage. Mostly radio. Regular citizens didn’t have access to radio in the rise of Germany in order to argue the other side. There were not millions of people across the world at the ready to refute the lies told by propagandists.
The current internet is absolutely filled with lies. AND it’s filled with those who refute those lies just as loudly. The part Gerson probably can’t take is that the current internet and it’s bazillion users also refute the lies told in the newspapers. How do you fight that?
Ethicist Clive Hamilton calls this a “belligerent brutopia.” “The Internet should represent a great flourishing of democratic participation,” he argues. “But it doesn’t. . .
When you start saying what free people should or shouldn’t be, you lose the democratic part.
The exploitation of technology by hatred will never be eliminated. But hatred must be confined to the fringes of our culture — as the hatred of other times should have been.
One of the beautiful things about this country is the first amendment. We get to say what we want when we want to and you get to dispute it equally as loud. The internet is basically a free forum for this. When people “exploit technology” for hate, others use it for good.
Good content wins because it’s better. Not because someone outlaws bad content.
Netanyahu has it right. Let Gaddafi speak. If you choose to sit and listen you will be outed.
Both things done freely.
China has become popular of late. Maybe Gerson should go there where “hate” is just not legal.
ps Gateway Pundit has a video of Val Prieto of Babalu Blog. This guys knows of liberty and it’s importance. Liberty is not just for me, it’s for thee too.